<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ron Thielen&#8217;s presentation on Enterprise Security Architecture</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itana.org/2007/01/04/ron-thielens-presentation-on-enterprise-security-architecture/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itana.org/2007/01/04/ron-thielens-presentation-on-enterprise-security-architecture/</link>
	<description>Enterprise, Business and Technical Architects in Academia</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 19:27:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: smwahe</title>
		<link>http://itana.org/2007/01/04/ron-thielens-presentation-on-enterprise-security-architecture/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[smwahe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 16:08:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.itana.org/2007/01/04/ron-thielens-presentation-on-enterprise-security-architecture/#comment-2</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This must have been a good presentation.  I think Ron has an important point that there is not a difference between the enterprise architecture versus a specific security architecture. I hope that those of us in security do not come across stating that there is a difference.  We do tend to have difficulties in identify were certain security controls should reside in the different parts of the architecture. Any thoughts? I like to think that security is what we do across the enterprise and is not its on block in a stack.

I also see that the security architecture diagram from the NAC ESA document was referenced.  I am proud of that work but when I show that diagram to people, I receive a glazed over deer in the headlights response.  Is there a way  to simplify that digram for the higher education environment?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This must have been a good presentation.  I think Ron has an important point that there is not a difference between the enterprise architecture versus a specific security architecture. I hope that those of us in security do not come across stating that there is a difference.  We do tend to have difficulties in identify were certain security controls should reside in the different parts of the architecture. Any thoughts? I like to think that security is what we do across the enterprise and is not its on block in a stack.</p>
<p>I also see that the security architecture diagram from the NAC ESA document was referenced.  I am proud of that work but when I show that diagram to people, I receive a glazed over deer in the headlights response.  Is there a way  to simplify that digram for the higher education environment?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

